WEBVTT

00:03.833 --> 00:06.583
- Ah, all right, Friday surprise,

00:07.999 --> 00:08.832
welcome.

00:09.679 --> 00:10.929
Hey, everybody,

00:13.220 --> 00:14.827
welcome to the State Department.

00:14.827 --> 00:16.660
It is indeed a Friday,

00:18.068 --> 00:21.005
which is, all things considered, a good thing.

00:21.005 --> 00:23.519
Before I start, I do want to give a shoutout

00:23.519 --> 00:26.324
to someone who is leaving us today,

00:26.324 --> 00:28.964
who served a short time in the Front Office

00:28.964 --> 00:30.391
and we didn't drive him away,

00:30.391 --> 00:31.224
I can guarantee you,

00:31.224 --> 00:33.149
but he's going back to the Motor City,

00:33.149 --> 00:35.899
to Detroit, and his family there.

00:36.262 --> 00:40.429
But Patrick Thelen, thanks so much for all you've done.

00:40.738 --> 00:42.629
And despite everything,

00:42.629 --> 00:45.212
he remains a Detroit Lions fan,

00:45.804 --> 00:47.028
and God bless him for that.

00:47.028 --> 00:48.269
(audience laughs)

00:48.269 --> 00:49.310
But we wish him all the best.

00:49.310 --> 00:50.727
He's a great guy.

00:51.019 --> 00:53.251
I don't have anything at the top.

00:53.251 --> 00:54.801
So I will go right to your questions.

00:54.801 --> 00:56.251
- [Matt] Again, two days in a row

00:56.251 --> 00:58.232
with nothing at the top, interesting.

00:58.232 --> 00:59.065
- You've exhausted us.

00:59.065 --> 01:00.033
- [Arshad] The Russians have something to say.

01:00.033 --> 01:01.772
- You've exhausted us.

01:01.772 --> 01:03.647
- [Matt] So, let's, uh,

01:03.647 --> 01:05.564
let's start with Syria.

01:06.036 --> 01:07.703
- Sure thing.

01:08.007 --> 01:09.482
- [Matt] I'm sure you're surprised.

01:09.482 --> 01:10.315
- Yeah.

01:10.370 --> 01:12.370
- It's now been two days

01:13.086 --> 01:15.544
since the Secretary, in a phone call

01:15.544 --> 01:19.377
with Foreign Minister Lavrov, told Russia that

01:20.445 --> 01:23.477
you would suspend the bilateral engagement unless Russia

01:23.477 --> 01:26.102
takes immediate steps to end the assault

01:26.102 --> 01:30.269
on Aleppo and restore the cessation of hostilities.

01:31.231 --> 01:34.497
Neither of those things have happened yet,

01:34.497 --> 01:35.568
that's correct?

01:35.568 --> 01:36.401
- [Mark] That's correct.

01:36.401 --> 01:39.654
- All right, so have you followed through then?

01:39.654 --> 01:42.154
I know that they talked again.

01:42.301 --> 01:44.884
- They did speak earlier today.

01:45.223 --> 01:46.989
Actually, when the Secretary was

01:46.989 --> 01:49.156
on route back from Israel,

01:51.264 --> 01:53.681
and we are at the same place.

01:54.778 --> 01:57.569
We have not definitively closed that door.

01:57.569 --> 01:59.569
We have not definitively

02:00.527 --> 02:02.527
suspended our diplomatic

02:04.219 --> 02:07.386
relations regarding Syria with Russia.

02:08.982 --> 02:12.982
We're on the verge, because we have not yet seen

02:13.001 --> 02:14.557
them take the kind of actions

02:14.557 --> 02:16.780
that we're looking to see them take.

02:16.780 --> 02:18.697
But we're not there yet

02:19.855 --> 02:22.438
and the conversation continues,

02:23.772 --> 02:26.286
but you know where we stand on this.

02:26.286 --> 02:29.786
I know that the Russians, as Arshad noted,

02:30.033 --> 02:34.116
have also been speaking to the media, but I think

02:36.067 --> 02:40.067
the Secretary has invested, as we all know here,

02:40.477 --> 02:44.256
a great amount of effort in a diplomatic process.

02:44.256 --> 02:48.017
There are other options that we've talked about here.

02:48.017 --> 02:50.242
Many of them are not very good,

02:50.242 --> 02:53.761
so before we definitively slam the door here,

02:53.761 --> 02:57.540
we want to make sure that we understand the stakes,

02:57.540 --> 03:01.115
and that Russia understands the stakes, more importantly,

03:01.115 --> 03:01.948
so that's it.

03:01.948 --> 03:05.099
- Wait, you say that your position is clear,

03:05.099 --> 03:08.323
but I thought your position was clear two days ago,

03:08.323 --> 03:11.388
that you were going to suspend this dialogue

03:11.388 --> 03:12.835
unless immediate action was taken.

03:12.835 --> 03:13.926
And it's now been 48 hours

03:13.926 --> 03:17.676
and there hasn't been any action, so I guess,

03:19.222 --> 03:21.008
I don't know how you can say your position is clear

03:21.008 --> 03:23.591
because it seems to be unclear.

03:23.990 --> 03:28.006
And not just to me, but presumably also to the Russians.

03:28.006 --> 03:29.756
You made this threat.

03:30.256 --> 03:32.643
They didn't do what you wanted them to do,

03:32.643 --> 03:34.762
and now you're not following through on it.

03:34.762 --> 03:37.845
- Well, and I certainly don't want to

03:39.263 --> 03:40.180
get into or

03:41.979 --> 03:45.796
divulge the content of our diplomatic discussions,

03:45.796 --> 03:48.094
but these are conversations on the phone.

03:48.094 --> 03:50.502
And so, I can't say what the Russians

03:50.502 --> 03:51.506
may be offering to do

03:51.506 --> 03:53.507
or the steps they make take or not take.

03:53.507 --> 03:55.008
Again, we're just not there or--

03:55.008 --> 03:56.308
- Are you suggesting,

03:56.308 --> 03:58.276
are you saying that, not suggesting,

03:58.276 --> 04:00.783
are you saying that there is some sign,

04:00.783 --> 04:03.033
some indication from Russia

04:04.015 --> 04:05.848
that hope is not lost,

04:06.523 --> 04:09.992
that they're willing to do something tangible

04:09.992 --> 04:13.242
in response to this ultimatum that was,

04:13.740 --> 04:16.241
seems to be a non-ultimatum, that was delivered?

04:16.241 --> 04:20.408
- Well again, I'll leave it more or less what I just said,

04:20.710 --> 04:24.877
which is that we continue to have conversations with Russia

04:26.286 --> 04:30.453
between Secretary Kerry and Foreign Minister Lavrov

04:35.638 --> 04:38.688
insofar as, we have not reached the point

04:38.688 --> 04:41.764
where we believe there's no reason to continue.

04:41.764 --> 04:45.764
- I get that, but the Secretary himself and others,

04:45.764 --> 04:49.931
in this context, and in the context of other negotiations,

04:51.254 --> 04:53.643
has said that there's no point in having talks--

04:53.643 --> 04:55.019
for the sake of talks.
- Agree,

04:55.019 --> 04:56.521
and that has not changed.

04:56.521 --> 04:57.521
So I’m saying--
- It hasn't?

04:57.521 --> 04:58.540
What are you--
- I just don't want

04:58.540 --> 05:00.783
to get into details of what,

05:00.783 --> 05:04.283
but I would say that we're not there yet.

05:04.572 --> 05:07.006
We may be in a matter of hours,

05:07.006 --> 05:09.412
in a matter of days, at that point,

05:09.412 --> 05:10.874
but we're not there yet.

05:10.874 --> 05:14.915
I don't know how to say it any more clearly than that.

05:14.915 --> 05:16.760
- [Matt] Or any less clearly (laughs).

05:16.760 --> 05:17.593
- [Barbara] Mark, yesterday--

05:17.593 --> 05:18.426
- Sure.

05:18.426 --> 05:19.259
- [Barbara] Sorry, Matt.

05:19.259 --> 05:20.092
- [Matt] No, I'm done.

05:20.092 --> 05:21.808
- Yesterday the Secretary said something

05:21.808 --> 05:24.558
to the effect that we don't want,

05:25.229 --> 05:26.759
we want to be pulling back from the process,

05:26.759 --> 05:28.497
so that we’re not seen as complicit.

05:28.497 --> 05:29.780
I don’t think he used the world complicit,

05:29.780 --> 05:31.780
but something like that,

05:32.021 --> 05:36.188
in empowering the Russians to do what they’re doing.

05:37.150 --> 05:38.475
Isn’t that what is happening?

05:38.475 --> 05:40.541
I mean, they’re continuing to do

05:40.541 --> 05:41.766
what they’re doing.

05:41.766 --> 05:43.333
- Well, they are and I think,

05:43.333 --> 05:47.500
so a couple of points to make there is, one is that

05:50.614 --> 05:52.278
we’re not blind to what is happening,

05:52.278 --> 05:54.842
and Secretary Kerry has clearly acknowledged

05:54.842 --> 05:56.425
that we’re outraged

05:57.462 --> 06:01.629
by what’s taking place right now with regard to Aleppo.

06:02.856 --> 06:05.189
And as he’s said many times,

06:06.014 --> 06:07.765
it’s egregious, it’s horrific,

06:07.765 --> 06:09.540
it’s in clear violation

06:09.540 --> 06:12.009
of international standards or norms,

06:12.009 --> 06:15.426
humanitarian norms and international law,

06:15.994 --> 06:19.859
and I think that at a certain point when you look at that,

06:19.859 --> 06:23.859
as we’ve been back and forth here on, it becomes

06:27.482 --> 06:31.649
futile to continue to believe in a diplomatic process.

06:32.990 --> 06:35.069
That said, I just can’t definitively say

06:35.069 --> 06:36.373
we’re there at that point yet.

06:36.373 --> 06:38.124
We’re very close, but we’re not there yet.

06:38.124 --> 06:38.957
- [Arshad] Mark you said--

06:38.957 --> 06:39.790
- Please.

06:39.790 --> 06:40.929
- Just a few minutes ago on TV,

06:40.929 --> 06:43.562
you said that it’s hard to continue to believe

06:43.562 --> 06:45.562
in a diplomatic process.

06:45.573 --> 06:46.906
So if it’s hard,

06:48.114 --> 06:49.614
why are you still,

06:50.533 --> 06:53.253
why do you still believe in a diplomatic process?

06:53.253 --> 06:55.336
- Well, so, first of all,

06:57.523 --> 07:00.780
Secretary Kerry is in a sense duty-bound

07:00.780 --> 07:02.780
to pursue the diplomatic

07:04.001 --> 07:07.834
process to the fullest extent that’s possible,

07:08.820 --> 07:11.258
and we have not reached that threshold yet.

07:11.258 --> 07:12.888
Again, I don’t want to get into the conversations

07:12.888 --> 07:15.286
that are still ongoing, but we’ve seen enough

07:15.286 --> 07:18.785
that we don’t want to definitively close the door yet.

07:18.785 --> 07:21.508
That, as I said, that may change

07:21.508 --> 07:23.001
in the coming hours or days.

07:23.001 --> 07:25.084
I just don’t have a clear

07:26.809 --> 07:27.983
time frame or time.

07:27.983 --> 07:30.381
- You’ve seen enough from Russia

07:30.381 --> 07:31.589
and that’s who you’re waiting on here.

07:31.589 --> 07:34.142
- We obviously haven't closed the window, the door,

07:34.142 --> 07:37.516
whatever the metaphor you want to use here.

07:37.516 --> 07:39.099
- [Arshad] But you've seen enough from whom

07:39.099 --> 07:40.204
or from where because--

07:40.204 --> 07:43.043
- No, I would say, that we’ve seen enough that,

07:43.043 --> 07:44.318
I can’t remember now what I just said,

07:44.318 --> 07:46.847
but (laughs) that there’s enough there

07:46.847 --> 07:49.847
that we don’t want to walk away yet.

07:49.980 --> 07:51.188
- [Arshad] From the talks with Russia?

07:51.188 --> 07:53.855
- Right, but what’s also another

07:56.623 --> 07:58.956
factor as we look at this is

07:59.730 --> 08:03.897
if we do walk away from this diplomatic process as

08:04.759 --> 08:07.009
frankly, moribund as it is,

08:08.866 --> 08:10.368
what are the options?

08:10.368 --> 08:13.257
And the Secretary has spoken about this.

08:13.257 --> 08:15.660
Many of them are not good options.

08:15.660 --> 08:17.369
We’re continuing to have those conversations

08:17.369 --> 08:20.049
within the interagency, continuing to evaluate

08:20.049 --> 08:23.879
what we can do to alleviate the suffering in Syria,

08:23.879 --> 08:26.156
but the last thing we want to see,

08:26.156 --> 08:28.258
obviously, is any kind of escalation.

08:28.258 --> 08:31.675
If we do pronounce the diplomatic process

08:35.318 --> 08:38.651
dead, then what we don’t want to see is,

08:39.449 --> 08:41.077
is an escalation in the violence,

08:41.077 --> 08:42.543
and that could very well be the result.

08:42.543 --> 08:44.539
- Why did you make this threat

08:44.539 --> 08:47.266
if you don’t seem willing to carry it out?

08:47.266 --> 08:48.099
Doesn’t that--

08:48.099 --> 08:49.513
- Well, I don't want to,

08:49.513 --> 08:51.930
again, we would not make such

08:52.675 --> 08:56.000
a statement if we weren’t willing to carry it out.

08:56.000 --> 08:57.750
And I also think that

09:00.750 --> 09:02.995
we’ve talked about this before in other negotiations,

09:02.995 --> 09:05.756
that at some point you’ve got to be able to say,

09:05.756 --> 09:07.105
if this is in no one’s interest

09:07.105 --> 09:10.565
to continue this conversation, this dialogue,

09:10.565 --> 09:12.918
then it behooves us to walk away from it.

09:12.918 --> 09:13.918
But I think,

09:15.888 --> 09:18.240
I agree, this is on life support,

09:18.240 --> 09:19.995
but it’s not flatlined yet.

09:19.995 --> 09:22.144
- [Dave] Mark, if at the moment the Syrian Army is--

09:22.144 --> 09:23.293
- I don't know, I'm trying--

09:23.293 --> 09:26.018
- [Matt] When has the administration

09:26.018 --> 09:29.062
actually carried out a threat to walk away?

09:29.062 --> 09:30.502
- Carried out a threat--

09:30.502 --> 09:32.792
- Well, I mean, it came, you didn't walk in,

09:32.792 --> 09:35.251
the US didn’t walk out of the Iran nuclear talks.

09:35.251 --> 09:36.084
- We didn’t, but we became close

09:36.084 --> 09:37.484
at several occasions, as you know.

09:37.484 --> 09:39.901
- Yeah, but you didn’t do it.

09:40.513 --> 09:42.031
And you could argue,

09:42.031 --> 09:43.753
or I’m sure you as you probably do

09:43.753 --> 09:47.236
that you got what you say is a successful deal

09:47.236 --> 09:49.571
out of it by not walking away.

09:49.571 --> 09:53.738
But in terms of Syria, the administration has twice

09:54.460 --> 09:58.527
said that it would do things if such and such happened

09:58.527 --> 10:00.694
or didn’t happen, and now,

10:01.102 --> 10:02.897
you know what I’m talking about.

10:02.897 --> 10:04.064
- [Mark] Sure.

10:04.996 --> 10:06.908
- And you didn’t follow through.

10:06.908 --> 10:08.825
So I guess,

10:09.748 --> 10:11.615
why should the Russians,

10:11.615 --> 10:13.521
or anyone else for that matter,

10:13.521 --> 10:15.021
take it seriously?

10:15.128 --> 10:17.279
- Well, again, I can’t speak to

10:17.279 --> 10:19.735
whether they do or don’t take us seriously,

10:19.735 --> 10:23.902
but they should. because we are reaching that point.

10:24.980 --> 10:25.813
- [Dave] Mark, if you break off--

10:25.813 --> 10:26.769
- Please, sorry, Dave, yeah.

10:26.769 --> 10:28.529
- Yeah, if break off the talks tomorrow, say,

10:28.529 --> 10:31.813
or in two days time because it’s not going anywhere,

10:31.813 --> 10:34.534
and then Mr. Lavrov calls you 24 hours later

10:34.534 --> 10:36.304
and say, "Oh, you were serious about that."

10:36.304 --> 10:39.887
Well, let’s get the talks up on again then.

10:40.490 --> 10:42.073
- Again, that's a--

10:42.165 --> 10:43.136
- [Dave] It's a hypothetical.

10:43.136 --> 10:43.969
- It's a hypothetical.

10:43.969 --> 10:45.760
- [Dave] But your threat is hypothetical for the moment.

10:45.760 --> 10:46.593
- It's a hypothetical.

10:46.593 --> 10:47.426
- It's your statement, sorry.

10:47.426 --> 10:50.009
- I would, with the caveat that

10:52.246 --> 10:54.663
at a certain point it becomes

10:55.537 --> 10:57.620
very difficult to believe

10:59.976 --> 11:02.059
that Russia is serious or

11:02.992 --> 11:05.260
possibly worse, has any influence

11:05.260 --> 11:07.668
to dissuade the regime from continuing

11:07.668 --> 11:09.751
to carry out strikes, but

11:10.983 --> 11:14.900
I think if at any point in time we’re gonna,

11:15.026 --> 11:18.692
if we believe that there’s a possibility for peace

11:18.692 --> 11:21.000
and a peaceful settlement of this,

11:21.000 --> 11:22.583
again, it would be,

11:25.340 --> 11:27.274
it'd be bad if we didn’t pursue it.

11:27.274 --> 11:30.262
- So you’d call off the talks if there’s no sign

11:30.262 --> 11:34.242
of the possibility of progress towards peaceful settlement.

11:34.242 --> 11:35.316
But if you call off the talks

11:35.316 --> 11:36.874
and then they ring you up and give you a sign,

11:36.874 --> 11:38.768
then you’ll put them on again

11:38.768 --> 11:40.534
so that nothing changes.
- Again, I don't want

11:40.534 --> 11:43.825
to predict, no, I don’t want to predict.

11:43.825 --> 11:46.492
I mean, what I think I would say

11:46.528 --> 11:49.611
is what we’re talking about here is the end of this

11:49.611 --> 11:51.107
so-called Geneva agreement.

11:51.107 --> 11:51.940
But this process that was reached,

11:51.940 --> 11:53.769
or this agreement, rather,

11:53.769 --> 11:56.602
that was reached on September 10th

11:57.457 --> 11:59.765
after many months of, as you guys know,

11:59.765 --> 12:01.827
consultation and close work

12:01.827 --> 12:04.327
and the promise that that held

12:05.994 --> 12:08.513
in many respects, including the possibility

12:08.513 --> 12:10.827
of some Joint Implementation Center.

12:10.827 --> 12:13.006
All of that, I think, would be shelved.

12:13.006 --> 12:15.531
- So for the past three days you’ve had daily phone calls

12:15.531 --> 12:17.225
with Foreign Minister Lavrov

12:17.225 --> 12:18.833
and for the past three days the Syrian army's

12:18.833 --> 12:22.250
made tactical advances around Aleppo.

12:22.291 --> 12:24.476
Will you be surprised if the day

12:24.476 --> 12:26.676
the Russian and Syrian forces

12:26.676 --> 12:28.063
get bogged down around Aleppo,

12:28.063 --> 12:30.246
then you get a more positive phone call?

12:30.246 --> 12:33.579
- Well, and perhaps that would mean that

12:34.486 --> 12:37.003
the regime and the Russians come to the conclusion

12:37.003 --> 12:39.336
that we’ve come to long ago,

12:39.599 --> 12:42.032
which is that there will be no military solution

12:42.032 --> 12:44.009
to the conflict in Syria.
- If they seize Aleppo,

12:44.009 --> 12:45.972
and then declare a ceasefire,

12:45.972 --> 12:47.267
will that be acceptable to you?

12:47.267 --> 12:48.876
- Again, I don’t want to,

12:48.876 --> 12:50.793
I’m not going to engage in hypotheticals.

12:50.793 --> 12:51.626
Please, Barbara.

12:51.626 --> 12:52.459
- [Barbara] Yeah, just a few questions

12:52.776 --> 12:54.918
because Mr. Lavrov has done an interview with the BBC

12:54.918 --> 12:56.484
and I wanted to get--
- That's right, he did.

12:56.484 --> 12:57.651
- Yes, he did.

12:58.093 --> 13:00.894
So he denied using banned weapons in Syria

13:00.894 --> 13:02.559
and he denied targeting civilians.

13:02.559 --> 13:04.534
He said there wasn’t evidence for that.

13:04.534 --> 13:06.491
And your response, first of all,

13:06.491 --> 13:09.587
but also does that kind of statement mean

13:09.587 --> 13:11.544
that you have any wiggle room left

13:11.544 --> 13:15.377
with these kinds of discussions you’re having?

13:16.987 --> 13:19.654
- So, I mean, look, we have seen

13:20.716 --> 13:23.299
the regime aided and abetted by

13:24.266 --> 13:25.099
Russian

13:26.071 --> 13:30.238
air power, carry out strikes against civilian targets.

13:31.753 --> 13:34.280
They may argue that they’re going after Nusrah

13:34.280 --> 13:36.947
and these are collateral damage.

13:36.983 --> 13:39.265
To a certain extent, that may be true,

13:39.265 --> 13:40.816
but there’s a way to do these kinds

13:40.816 --> 13:43.066
of strikes that limit that.

13:43.459 --> 13:46.126
But I think we’ve also just seen

13:47.738 --> 13:51.655
evidence of attacks on civilian infrastructure,

13:52.628 --> 13:55.211
and obviously on civilians that

13:55.773 --> 13:59.940
are inexplicable in terms of trying to go after Nusrah.

14:00.253 --> 14:03.003
In terms of where that leaves us,

14:03.479 --> 14:05.562
I think, as I said,

14:05.992 --> 14:07.159
it's difficult

14:09.483 --> 14:12.983
to continue to pursue a diplomatic process

14:13.024 --> 14:15.607
in the midst of so much carnage

14:16.983 --> 14:19.498
and so much evidence to the contrary.

14:19.498 --> 14:22.791
And I think that’s one of the reasons why

14:22.791 --> 14:25.374
we’re looking for some kind of,

14:25.739 --> 14:28.284
against extraordinary action or extraordinary measures

14:28.284 --> 14:31.570
that at least give some sign that Russia

14:31.570 --> 14:34.518
and/or the regime are in any way interested

14:34.518 --> 14:36.518
in a credible cessation.

14:37.022 --> 14:39.240
- And he’s also, and he said this before,

14:39.240 --> 14:40.282
but he kind of spelled it out

14:40.282 --> 14:41.773
quite strongly in this interview,

14:41.773 --> 14:44.274
that the Russians are saying there’s more and more evidence

14:44.274 --> 14:47.871
to believe that the US, from the very start,

14:47.871 --> 14:50.204
planned to protect al-Nusrah

14:50.286 --> 14:53.119
as a kind of Plan B against Assad.

14:56.223 --> 14:58.890
- Honestly, I saw those remarks.

14:59.010 --> 15:01.260
It left me shaking my head.

15:01.500 --> 15:02.798
I don’t know what he means by it.

15:02.798 --> 15:06.255
Well, I can conjecture what he means by it, but it’s absurd.

15:06.255 --> 15:09.386
- But do you think the fact that the US hasn’t

15:09.386 --> 15:11.284
been able to separate the opposition from Nusrah,

15:11.284 --> 15:12.552
which is what the Russians keep saying,

15:12.552 --> 15:15.134
how much of a factor is that in the escalation?

15:15.134 --> 15:19.301
- So granted, up to the September 10th agreement in Geneva,

15:19.500 --> 15:23.629
we talked a lot about that comingling or

15:23.629 --> 15:25.812
marbelization, whatever the term is,

15:25.812 --> 15:27.114
and it was a reality.

15:27.114 --> 15:28.531
We conceded that.

15:29.289 --> 15:32.072
And it was our challenge coming to the table,

15:32.072 --> 15:33.613
agreeing in Geneva.

15:33.613 --> 15:35.864
Our challenge was to try as best we can

15:35.864 --> 15:39.109
to reach out to the moderate opposition

15:39.109 --> 15:41.298
and make clear to them that they needed to

15:41.298 --> 15:43.782
in order for this thing to work, and we did that.

15:43.782 --> 15:45.793
We did it with our special envoy, Michael Ratney,

15:45.793 --> 15:47.960
but we did it through,

15:48.010 --> 15:50.527
also, the other members of the ISSG,

15:50.527 --> 15:52.610
other member governments,

15:52.630 --> 15:55.453
to reach out to the groups that they had contacts with

15:55.453 --> 15:58.997
to sell the deal, if I could put it that way,

15:58.997 --> 16:00.441
to convince these groups

16:00.441 --> 16:04.608
that it was in their best interest to abide by it.

16:06.984 --> 16:09.317
Were we 100% effective?

16:09.743 --> 16:11.247
No, but were we effective?

16:11.247 --> 16:14.080
Yes, and there was several days of

16:14.792 --> 16:16.811
a significant reduction in violence.

16:16.811 --> 16:18.578
But what’s happened now

16:18.578 --> 16:21.094
with the hitting of the humanitarian convoy

16:21.094 --> 16:23.263
and with the subsequent siege on Aleppo,

16:23.263 --> 16:26.783
you’ve got a scenario now, a dynamic where,

16:26.783 --> 16:30.674
as these moderate opposition forces are under real

16:30.674 --> 16:32.525
and increasing pressure by the regime,

16:32.525 --> 16:34.572
that they’re driven more or less into the arms.

16:34.572 --> 16:38.229
They have to turn to Nusrah, fight side by side.

16:38.229 --> 16:42.312
So it escalates and makes more confusing

16:42.396 --> 16:46.287
and more jumbled what is already a difficult situation.

16:46.287 --> 16:47.892
- [Barbara] Can I just ask one more question?

16:47.892 --> 16:49.015
- Please, yeah.

16:49.015 --> 16:49.848
- [Matt] Be very brief.

16:49.848 --> 16:50.681
- Okay.

16:50.681 --> 16:51.514
- Just before I get,

16:51.514 --> 16:53.348
you talked about how you don’t want to close,

16:53.348 --> 16:55.074
slam the door shut right now.

16:55.074 --> 16:58.275
Why in your estimation would it be so difficult

16:58.275 --> 16:59.858
to reopen that door

17:02.475 --> 17:05.142
and follow through on the threat

17:05.247 --> 17:06.914
and then to stop it,

17:07.387 --> 17:10.970
and then see if that changes the situation?

17:11.406 --> 17:14.998
Why are you afraid, I guess, for lack of a better word

17:14.998 --> 17:16.988
that the door would be so hard to reopen?

17:16.988 --> 17:18.905
- It’s a fair question.

17:19.025 --> 17:20.608
I think what we’re,

17:22.991 --> 17:24.758
and I tried to explain this.

17:24.758 --> 17:26.774
What we’re talking about, what was reached in Geneva.

17:26.774 --> 17:28.707
It’s not to say that it would be impossible

17:28.707 --> 17:31.387
to somehow recreate that in some fashion,

17:31.387 --> 17:33.795
but I think a couple of things is, one is

17:33.795 --> 17:35.794
we’d set that aside for now and just say,

17:35.794 --> 17:36.627
"Look, that did not work.

17:36.627 --> 17:37.460
"That was a failed effort."

17:38.782 --> 17:39.865
And then two,

17:41.273 --> 17:43.273
we would consider as we,

17:43.751 --> 17:46.050
if Russia did come back to us in a week

17:46.050 --> 17:48.133
or ten days or two weeks,

17:49.725 --> 17:52.892
it would factor into our consideration

17:53.741 --> 17:56.253
the fact that they failed so miserably

17:56.253 --> 17:58.846
to live up to any kind of deal that,

17:58.846 --> 18:00.508
an agreement that we reached.

18:00.508 --> 18:03.758
So again, it’s a matter of credibility.

18:03.772 --> 18:05.514
- [Matt] Okay, thank you.

18:05.514 --> 18:07.506
(reporters talking over one another)

18:07.506 --> 18:08.339
- Of course.

18:08.339 --> 18:09.565
Sorry, we'll get there.
- That's okay.

18:09.565 --> 18:11.815
- Can you work with people,

18:12.751 --> 18:16.418
if Nusrah fighters are fighting side by side

18:17.054 --> 18:19.637
with fighters that you support?

18:19.969 --> 18:22.253
Can you then work with the fighters that you support,

18:22.253 --> 18:25.331
or have they then become people who are providing

18:25.331 --> 18:28.341
material support to terrorists and therefore you can't--

18:28.341 --> 18:29.174
- That’s a fair.

18:29.174 --> 18:30.007
Sir, I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to.

18:30.007 --> 18:30.840
- [Arshad] Oh, yeah.

18:30.840 --> 18:33.957
- I think that was part of, you know, that was,

18:33.957 --> 18:36.888
one of the big pieces of this effort,

18:36.888 --> 18:38.888
I apologize, some water.

18:40.199 --> 18:41.547
One of the big pieces of this effort

18:41.547 --> 18:43.784
coming out of Geneva was to attempt to do that,

18:43.784 --> 18:44.659
was to say, "Look, guys,

18:44.659 --> 18:47.409
"we’ll have a seven-day period of

18:48.231 --> 18:50.790
"cessation of violence or a significant reduction

18:50.790 --> 18:52.519
"in the level of violence."

18:52.519 --> 18:55.544
And at that point in time, after seven days,

18:55.544 --> 18:57.031
the regime would ground its air forces,

18:57.031 --> 19:00.576
we would set up this JIC, Joint Implementation Center.

19:00.576 --> 19:04.033
And at that point, you’re either with us or against us.

19:04.033 --> 19:05.512
I’m talking about the moderate opposition.

19:05.512 --> 19:07.825
That would have been a clear line in the sand,

19:07.825 --> 19:09.441
if you will or whatever

19:09.441 --> 19:13.358
that they were either still with Nusrah or not.

19:13.975 --> 19:15.308
Again, we talked about this.

19:15.308 --> 19:16.790
It’s self-identifying, but it’s also,

19:16.790 --> 19:18.516
it would have been a clear starting point

19:18.516 --> 19:19.808
from that point on to say,

19:19.808 --> 19:21.997
"Okay, you’ve made your choice, I guess."

19:21.997 --> 19:25.747
- Just, and Barbara, one other one, if I may.

19:26.342 --> 19:28.925
In that interview with the BBC,

19:29.012 --> 19:31.983
Foreign Secretary, Foreign Minister Lavrov said

19:31.983 --> 19:34.518
what the Russians have been saying for a number of days now,

19:34.518 --> 19:37.005
which is that accusing the United States

19:37.005 --> 19:38.588
of having failed to

19:40.746 --> 19:41.663
disentangle

19:42.662 --> 19:46.662
the Nusrah from the opposition that you support.

19:47.369 --> 19:50.536
Is it your view that the US Government

19:51.235 --> 19:52.152
was obliged

19:53.868 --> 19:56.201
immediately upon declaration

19:57.274 --> 20:01.441
or implementation of the ceasefire on September 12th,

20:02.874 --> 20:04.539
that it was your immediate obligation

20:04.539 --> 20:06.980
to begin disentangling the two?

20:06.980 --> 20:09.515
Or rather, is it your view that that was a process

20:09.515 --> 20:13.682
that was going to start after a week of a ceasefire?

20:14.261 --> 20:18.344
- Yeah, so what I think was understood was

20:18.729 --> 20:22.813
while we wouldn’t, from 12:01, whatever it was, on the Eid

20:22.813 --> 20:25.293
that that seven-day period began,

20:25.293 --> 20:27.051
expect any kind of like all right, guys,

20:27.051 --> 20:28.327
we’re moving over to this section

20:28.327 --> 20:30.034
and we’re disentangling ourselves,

20:30.034 --> 20:32.759
that over the course of that week, if we had gotten there.

20:32.759 --> 20:35.592
And we talked about that a lot is,

20:35.734 --> 20:37.001
during those initial days,

20:37.001 --> 20:38.763
is that we didn’t expect a clean break.

20:38.763 --> 20:39.698
We never did.

20:39.698 --> 20:40.781
I don’t think anybody did.

20:40.781 --> 20:42.503
I don’t think the Russians, the regime,

20:42.503 --> 20:44.778
but that we would work towards that

20:44.778 --> 20:47.011
over the course of a period of time.

20:47.011 --> 20:50.280
Seven days or whatever to expect to see that.

20:50.280 --> 20:53.613
Once we felt that we were at that point,

20:54.245 --> 20:58.412
to the best of an agreed-upon ability to reach that point,

20:58.957 --> 21:00.657
then we would say, "Okay, we’re ready to move

21:00.657 --> 21:02.239
"on to the next phase."

21:02.239 --> 21:03.271
At that point, as I said,

21:03.271 --> 21:07.247
then it’s, the moderate opposition who are integrated

21:07.247 --> 21:10.391
with al-Nusrah would have had a choice to make.

21:10.391 --> 21:13.524
- So, in other words, are they making a fair point here,

21:13.524 --> 21:16.107
the Russians, that they said you failed

21:16.107 --> 21:17.839
to do the disentangling?

21:17.839 --> 21:19.137
- No, because there wasn't enough time.

21:19.137 --> 21:21.212
We did not have enough time to fully,

21:21.212 --> 21:22.295
sorry, I didn't mean to talk over you.

21:22.295 --> 21:23.128
- [Arshad] No, no, go ahead.

21:23.128 --> 21:26.759
- We did not have enough time to fully implement

21:26.759 --> 21:27.926
the agreement,

21:28.934 --> 21:31.709
and I talked about this a short time ago,

21:31.709 --> 21:35.542
is what you had starting last weekend with the

21:38.533 --> 21:39.783
barrage and the

21:40.724 --> 21:42.474
airstrikes on Aleppo,

21:44.155 --> 21:46.322
you've just, again, driven

21:47.615 --> 21:49.217
the opposition back into the,

21:49.217 --> 21:51.464
you recreated what was there before.

21:51.464 --> 21:53.397
That doesn't make anything any easier.

21:53.397 --> 21:56.397
When these groups are under the gun,

21:57.123 --> 22:01.290
literally, by the regime and by Russian airstrikes,

22:03.636 --> 22:06.636
the enemy of my friend is my friend.

22:08.099 --> 22:10.278
Or sorry, the friend of my enemy is my--

22:10.278 --> 22:11.111
(reporters laugh)

22:11.111 --> 22:11.944
What is it?

22:11.944 --> 22:12.860
Whatever the damn thing is.

22:12.860 --> 22:14.443
- [Arshad] The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

22:14.443 --> 22:16.005
- Yeah, the enemy of my enemy is my friend,

22:16.005 --> 22:18.513
and so you're gonna have a dynamic

22:18.513 --> 22:22.501
where you're driving them back into the arms or Nusrah.

22:22.501 --> 22:24.207
- And just to get back to my original question,

22:24.207 --> 22:26.053
can you continue to offer support

22:26.053 --> 22:28.648
to people that are fighting side by side

22:28.648 --> 22:31.815
with people you deem to be terrorists?

22:32.445 --> 22:33.577
If they're fighting with them,

22:33.577 --> 22:35.893
they're providing material support to them, right?

22:35.893 --> 22:38.070
So, can you still provide assistance

22:38.070 --> 22:40.320
to the so-called moderates?

22:40.658 --> 22:41.703
- So, I wanna talk about,

22:41.703 --> 22:44.283
and for various reasons I don't want

22:44.283 --> 22:45.348
to necessarily get into the details

22:45.348 --> 22:47.756
of who are among the moderate opposition

22:47.756 --> 22:50.589
we may be providing assistance to.

22:50.856 --> 22:53.172
I think that that's all under consideration

22:53.172 --> 22:55.994
and when we look at who we might provide assistance to

22:55.994 --> 22:57.282
among the moderate opposition,

22:57.282 --> 22:58.362
we're constantly looking at--

22:58.362 --> 23:00.246
- [Arshad] But as a matter of law, can you do that?

23:00.246 --> 23:01.273
- I don't think we can,

23:01.273 --> 23:03.690
but I also think that we look

23:05.993 --> 23:07.692
at a number of factors

23:07.692 --> 23:09.511
when we evaluate or look at

23:09.511 --> 23:12.258
how we provide assistance to these groups.

23:12.258 --> 23:13.748
That's one of them, clearly,

23:13.748 --> 23:15.925
but the other is their behavior,

23:15.925 --> 23:17.175
whether they're

23:20.140 --> 23:22.041
guilty of committing human rights abuses

23:22.041 --> 23:23.782
or anything like that.

23:23.782 --> 23:25.365
- A final question,

23:25.942 --> 23:28.870
in again, with regards to the Russian suspicions,

23:28.870 --> 23:31.778
you haven't really gone after Nusrah that much.

23:31.778 --> 23:34.356
Have you been holding back on going after Nusrah

23:34.356 --> 23:37.458
because they were mixed with the opposition?

23:37.458 --> 23:39.095
All we hear about is the strikes on ISIS.

23:39.095 --> 23:40.419
We don't hear about strikes on Nusrah.

23:40.419 --> 23:41.252
- So,--

23:43.756 --> 23:46.122
- Sorry, let me ask you a second question, too, before,

23:46.122 --> 23:48.338
the other one is you keep saying

23:48.338 --> 23:50.904
there's no military solution, and so therefore

23:50.904 --> 23:52.570
you have to keep the diplomatic channel open,

23:52.570 --> 23:53.525
but we're not actually talking

23:53.525 --> 23:54.639
about a military solution are we?

23:54.639 --> 23:58.472
We're talking about a credible threat of force

23:58.586 --> 24:00.502
to help a diplomatic solution,

24:00.502 --> 24:01.948
so my second question would be

24:01.948 --> 24:04.031
is that under discussion?

24:04.031 --> 24:04.948
But anyway.

24:06.704 --> 24:09.704
- Without lending one option anymore

24:10.963 --> 24:13.628
importance or significance than any other option,

24:13.628 --> 24:16.018
I would say all options are under discussion,

24:16.018 --> 24:17.757
in answer to your second question.

24:17.757 --> 24:19.659
In answer to your first question,

24:19.659 --> 24:21.268
which was, again, about?

24:21.268 --> 24:22.779
- [Barbara] We keep hearing about striking ISIS,

24:22.779 --> 24:23.868
but never about striking Nusrah.

24:23.868 --> 24:25.656
- Yeah, we did carryout strikes initially

24:25.656 --> 24:28.573
back in 2014, 2015, against Nusrah,

24:28.955 --> 24:31.328
but absolutely you're correct in that

24:31.328 --> 24:33.002
as they became intermingled

24:33.002 --> 24:34.502
and as they became

24:36.416 --> 24:38.687
intermingled in civilian areas,

24:38.687 --> 24:41.020
we've always sought to limit

24:41.610 --> 24:44.777
the possibility of civilian casualties

24:45.738 --> 24:47.689
in any of our air strikes.

24:47.689 --> 24:48.729
And, again, one of the things

24:48.729 --> 24:51.996
I talked a little bit about this week is

24:51.996 --> 24:54.450
what, partly, the promise that this

24:54.450 --> 24:57.425
Joint Implementation Center held was

24:57.425 --> 24:59.456
we wanted to work in a very strategic fashion

24:59.456 --> 25:03.289
about how to take out senior Nusrah leadership

25:03.439 --> 25:06.429
like we've done pretty effectively again ISIL.

25:06.429 --> 25:08.819
And that doesn't include just laying waste

25:08.819 --> 25:12.986
to populated areas that may be under Nusrah's control.

25:13.614 --> 25:16.947
That's a very non-surgical way to do it.

25:17.222 --> 25:18.180
- [Man In Blue Jacket] Can I just ask a follow-up?

25:18.180 --> 25:19.180
- Of course.

25:19.274 --> 25:20.700
- [Man In Blue Jacket] You hit Nusrah,

25:20.700 --> 25:23.087
I believe you described it as Al-Qaeda--

25:23.087 --> 25:23.920
- Affiliate.

25:23.920 --> 25:27.396
- Maybe in March or something, or it was earlier this year,

25:27.396 --> 25:30.614
since then, there hasn't been any specific

25:30.614 --> 25:31.720
action against Nusrah.

25:31.720 --> 25:34.303
Is that right, military action?

25:34.645 --> 25:35.945
- No, but I'd have to double check.

25:35.945 --> 25:37.765
I just can't definitively say that

25:37.765 --> 25:39.845
and I think because of that,

25:39.845 --> 25:41.812
that space is one occupied by

25:41.812 --> 25:44.218
regime and Russian air forces,

25:44.218 --> 25:46.551
but also because of the mix.

25:47.712 --> 25:50.101
- Given that you've described the JIC

25:50.101 --> 25:52.018
as something that would be, the Secretary has,

25:52.018 --> 25:53.936
it would be in US interest anyways

25:53.936 --> 25:56.000
because you want to target Nusrah.

25:56.000 --> 25:56.833
- [Mark] Yes.

25:56.833 --> 25:59.169
- Why aren't you attacking Nusrah anyhow

25:59.169 --> 26:00.002
if it's in--

26:00.002 --> 26:00.988
- That's what I was saying,

26:00.988 --> 26:02.510
but I'm sorry if I wasn't clear--

26:02.510 --> 26:03.343
- [Man In Blue Jacket] No, no, I understand

26:03.343 --> 26:04.843
what you're saying, but how would that change

26:04.843 --> 26:06.515
by cooperating with Russia?

26:06.515 --> 26:09.308
You still wouldn't attack civilian population,

26:09.308 --> 26:10.141
you still--

26:10.141 --> 26:11.893
- No, but what we would, again,

26:11.893 --> 26:14.038
and I would really encourage you

26:14.038 --> 26:16.314
to talk to someone at the Pentagon

26:16.314 --> 26:18.085
who can give you a much more detailed

26:18.085 --> 26:20.102
tactical view of this, but

26:20.102 --> 26:22.685
one of the premises behind this

26:22.985 --> 26:24.221
was that it would allow us

26:24.221 --> 26:27.520
to better share intelligence and information

26:27.520 --> 26:28.674
and really target, as I said,

26:28.674 --> 26:31.007
senior leaders among Nusrah,

26:31.486 --> 26:33.399
and go after them in a much more strategic fashion,

26:33.399 --> 26:35.545
rather than, frankly, using dumb bombs

26:35.545 --> 26:38.712
and cluster bombs or cluster munitions

26:38.747 --> 26:41.798
and that kind of thing where we're just, again

26:41.798 --> 26:43.052
laying waste to an area

26:43.052 --> 26:45.212
versus going after a specific target

26:45.212 --> 26:47.065
or group of individuals.

26:47.065 --> 26:48.951
- If you had actionable intelligence

26:48.951 --> 26:51.421
against Nusrah senior leaders,

26:51.421 --> 26:53.088
as you describe 'em,

26:53.262 --> 26:55.803
would you be able to target them today or not?

26:55.803 --> 26:58.636
Because Aleppo and Idlib and a lot

26:58.761 --> 27:01.344
of these areas are out of your,

27:02.902 --> 27:05.652
are they in the confliction zone?

27:10.041 --> 27:11.476
- I would encourage you to talk to somebody

27:11.476 --> 27:12.531
from the Department of Defense,

27:12.531 --> 27:13.897
whether we would be able to,

27:13.897 --> 27:15.782
through our de-confliction mechanism,

27:15.782 --> 27:17.179
be able to target them.

27:17.179 --> 27:18.658
- [Man In Blue Jacket] Okay.

27:18.658 --> 27:19.942
- Sorry, Samir and then Nick.

27:19.942 --> 27:22.380
- [Samir] Is the US providing the Syrian opposition--

27:22.380 --> 27:23.213
- Excuse me?

27:23.213 --> 27:25.647
- Is the US providing the Syrian opposition

27:25.647 --> 27:28.397
any military help or any guidance

27:28.621 --> 27:30.929
to prevent the fall of east Aleppo

27:30.929 --> 27:32.831
to the Syrian and the Russians?

27:32.831 --> 27:33.914
- Well, look,

27:37.077 --> 27:41.244
we do provide them some support and some guidance.

27:41.283 --> 27:42.551
I don’t want to get into details,

27:42.551 --> 27:44.110
and I don’t want to get into discussions

27:44.110 --> 27:47.052
of which groups among the moderate opposition

27:47.052 --> 27:49.135
that we support, but yes.

27:49.295 --> 27:50.644
- [Samir] But you are providing?

27:50.644 --> 27:52.009
- We do provide assistance.

27:52.009 --> 27:52.842
- [Samir] But did you increase it--

27:52.842 --> 27:53.699
- Oh, I'm sorry. Did we what?

27:53.699 --> 27:56.021
- [Samir] Did you increase it recently after the offenses?

27:56.021 --> 27:58.135
- I’m not sure, I’m not sure.

27:58.135 --> 27:58.968
Please.

27:58.968 --> 28:01.206
- Just quickly, to circle about

28:01.206 --> 28:02.961
to what we were talking about at the beginning,

28:02.961 --> 28:04.211
what more would

28:04.961 --> 28:06.378
Russia need to do

28:06.554 --> 28:08.567
for you to move from the verge

28:08.567 --> 28:11.650
to actually closing the door on them?

28:12.679 --> 28:15.361
It seems like it's gotten a lot worse in the last week.

28:15.361 --> 28:16.970
- [Mark] Yes it has. That’s --

28:16.970 --> 28:19.246
- So, what more would need to happen?

28:19.246 --> 28:22.163
- Well, I think, again, to offer to

28:22.503 --> 28:24.364
at the very least, to put in place

28:24.364 --> 28:26.508
or stop the siege, declare a--

28:26.508 --> 28:27.716
- [Nick] No, I mean what more would need to happen

28:27.716 --> 28:28.832
for you guys to actually walk away?

28:28.832 --> 28:29.790
- Oh, I’m sorry. I apologize, okay.

28:29.790 --> 28:32.790
I get where you’re going now, sorry.

28:35.870 --> 28:37.203
It’s hard for me to say

28:37.203 --> 28:40.120
that a particular action or another

28:41.296 --> 28:43.621
event would push us over the edge.

28:43.621 --> 28:46.010
All I can say, Nick, is that we’re very close.

28:46.010 --> 28:48.843
- Because that then the question--

28:49.509 --> 28:51.931
- I think it’s rather not a question of,

28:51.931 --> 28:55.514
I think it’s a question that if the current

28:56.318 --> 28:58.609
pattern continues any longer,

28:58.609 --> 29:01.876
and we don’t see any effort to, in any way,

29:01.876 --> 29:05.209
arrest that or stop that or improve that

29:06.236 --> 29:10.319
environment or climate or whatever around Aleppo,

29:12.216 --> 29:14.544
at some point, we’ll say okay, and walk away.

29:14.544 --> 29:17.027
- So does the fact that you haven’t walked away

29:17.027 --> 29:20.110
given that it’s gotten so much worse,

29:20.246 --> 29:23.413
can we read that as an indication that

29:23.822 --> 29:27.267
the US and Russia are discussing something now

29:27.267 --> 29:30.177
that does provide hope that this thing can be salvaged?

29:30.177 --> 29:31.054
- I wouldn't use hope.

29:31.054 --> 29:34.387
I think that we haven’t closed the door,

29:34.612 --> 29:36.029
that we're still,

29:37.815 --> 29:38.898
there’s still

29:41.423 --> 29:45.194
some sense that there are steps that could be taken,

29:45.194 --> 29:47.194
but I don’t want to even

29:49.244 --> 29:50.701
characterize it as hopeful.

29:50.701 --> 29:51.534
- [Arshad] Mark, one quick one.

29:51.534 --> 29:52.451
- Yes, sir.

29:52.882 --> 29:53.715
I’ll get to you.

29:53.715 --> 29:56.153
- [Arshad] You saw the report that said that Russia

29:56.153 --> 29:59.070
is moving more aircraft into Syria.

30:00.157 --> 30:01.317
Can you confirm that?

30:01.317 --> 30:02.150
- I can’t.

30:02.571 --> 30:05.204
I saw the same report and looking to clarify

30:05.204 --> 30:08.267
or get confirmation of it, but I wasn’t able to.

30:08.267 --> 30:09.100
Please, Lucas.

30:09.100 --> 30:12.517
- [Lucas] How close is Aleppo to falling?

30:12.530 --> 30:14.447
- Again, I'm, you know,

30:15.412 --> 30:17.412
I don’t want to predict.

30:18.322 --> 30:21.489
I just don’t have that kind of clarity

30:22.537 --> 30:25.204
and knowledge at that level, but

30:28.329 --> 30:30.381
we heard it here just a little while ago

30:30.381 --> 30:32.381
that there appears to be

30:34.612 --> 30:38.779
forces massing for some kind of assault on Aleppo.

30:39.003 --> 30:41.330
We’re watching it very closely, but it’s hard to say.

30:41.330 --> 30:44.024
As you know watching conflict zones around the world,

30:44.024 --> 30:46.941
it’s hard to say when and if a city

30:47.096 --> 30:48.734
or population center could fall.

30:48.734 --> 30:52.317
But given the uptick in violence, given the

30:54.140 --> 30:56.390
intensity of it, it’s hard.

30:57.102 --> 30:57.935
It could be soon.

30:57.935 --> 30:58.768
- [Lucas] Does the United States have

30:58.768 --> 31:02.935
a moral obligation to help the citizens of Aleppo?

31:03.992 --> 31:06.742
- That is a fair question to ask.

31:06.890 --> 31:09.807
I think that that is something that

31:10.043 --> 31:11.537
we have sought to do

31:11.537 --> 31:15.704
by pursuing so aggressively this diplomatic process.

31:16.445 --> 31:20.278
I think we’ve also sought to do so by pursuing

31:21.849 --> 31:23.757
and increasing, even this past week,

31:23.757 --> 31:25.736
our humanitarian assistance to those

31:25.736 --> 31:27.122
who've been displaced by the fighting

31:27.122 --> 31:28.922
but also those within Syria

31:28.922 --> 31:30.901
and trying to continue to get them

31:30.901 --> 31:33.762
some level or some measure of assistance

31:33.762 --> 31:35.512
despite the fighting.

31:36.030 --> 31:38.441
These are tough options, as I said,

31:38.441 --> 31:40.223
and the Secretary's spoken about this,

31:40.223 --> 31:41.580
is there’s no good options.

31:41.580 --> 31:44.663
And when you look at what’s possible,

31:47.023 --> 31:49.381
it means, and these are all things we have to weigh,

31:49.381 --> 31:53.286
greater military involvement on behalf of the US

31:53.286 --> 31:56.203
and putting American lives at risk,

31:56.871 --> 32:01.038
so you have to weigh all of these things, and I agree,

32:01.695 --> 32:03.045
as much of it’s a moral outrage,

32:03.045 --> 32:06.248
what’s going on there, that all has to be weighed.

32:06.248 --> 32:08.480
- Today marks the one-year anniversary

32:08.480 --> 32:10.567
of Russia’s airstrikes in Syria.

32:10.567 --> 32:13.900
How would you characterize the last year

32:13.932 --> 32:16.758
in Syria with these Russian strikes?

32:16.758 --> 32:18.827
And Russia’s goal was to prop up

32:18.827 --> 32:20.645
the Assad regime, and it appears

32:20.645 --> 32:22.193
that their goal has been reached,

32:22.193 --> 32:24.443
as they’ve been successful.

32:25.054 --> 32:28.471
- You’re right, it is a grim anniversary since,

32:28.471 --> 32:30.638
one year since, they began

32:32.124 --> 32:36.291
supporting the Assad regime in earnest with airstrikes.

32:43.083 --> 32:44.487
It is hard not to assess

32:44.487 --> 32:46.737
that they have succeeded in

32:46.952 --> 32:48.702
bolstering the regime

32:50.947 --> 32:54.388
and that, at least at the purely tactical level

32:54.388 --> 32:56.221
or the short-term was,

32:57.573 --> 32:58.653
as a short-term goal,

32:58.653 --> 33:00.736
was clearly their intent.

33:00.903 --> 33:02.412
They’ve been clear about that.

33:02.412 --> 33:06.495
And one of their concerns was that if Assad fell,

33:07.847 --> 33:10.027
if the government fell, that there would be chaos,

33:10.027 --> 33:13.360
and that would allow terrorist groups to

33:14.408 --> 33:15.408
consolidate.

33:16.298 --> 33:19.215
Our argument has consistently been,

33:19.285 --> 33:23.118
while recognizing that we don’t want a vacuum,

33:24.376 --> 33:26.644
that there's a diplomatic way to get there,

33:26.644 --> 33:30.009
ceasefire, parties negotiate, work out a plan.

33:30.009 --> 33:32.944
We don’t throw the baby out with the bath water,

33:32.944 --> 33:35.067
certain government infrastructure remains,

33:35.067 --> 33:37.734
civilian infrastructure remains.

33:37.784 --> 33:39.150
There’s a way to get there without doing

33:39.150 --> 33:40.573
what they’re doing right now.

33:40.573 --> 33:42.031
So if they succeeded in propping up

33:42.031 --> 33:44.407
and creating some kind of stalemate,

33:44.407 --> 33:45.414
okay, so be it.

33:45.414 --> 33:48.039
Then we were able to put a cessation of hostilities in

33:48.039 --> 33:51.789
and then create that negotiating process, but

33:54.287 --> 33:56.586
it becomes increasingly evident

33:56.586 --> 33:59.699
that they may have broader or greater aims than that.

33:59.699 --> 34:00.709
- [Lucas] I have a few questions on Iran,

34:00.709 --> 34:01.542
if you don’t mind.

34:01.542 --> 34:02.375
- Iran, sure. Are we done with –

34:02.375 --> 34:03.208
- [Lucas] Oh sure, of course.

34:03.208 --> 34:04.479
- [Dave] Can I ask a follow-up quickly on Syria first?

34:04.479 --> 34:05.312
- [Man In Blue Jacket] One more on Syria.

34:05.312 --> 34:06.232
- Okay, great.

34:06.232 --> 34:07.413
- [Dave] Sir, if eastern Aleppo does fall,

34:07.413 --> 34:09.027
is that a defeat for US policy

34:09.027 --> 34:09.875
given your response to --

34:09.875 --> 34:12.125
- I think it’s a defeat for

34:13.398 --> 34:15.090
the world in the sense that it’s just gonna

34:15.090 --> 34:18.546
create a greater hardship for the Syrian people,

34:18.546 --> 34:21.620
it’s going to create more chaos within Syria

34:21.620 --> 34:25.203
and allow what are clearly terrorist groups

34:25.649 --> 34:27.854
like ISIL and Nusrah with aims

34:27.854 --> 34:29.491
to carry out terrorist attacks,

34:29.491 --> 34:32.800
not only within Syria, but more broadly,

34:32.800 --> 34:34.937
to consolidate and to strengthen.

34:34.937 --> 34:37.816
So it’s a losing proposition no matter who you are.

34:37.816 --> 34:39.720
- And in your response to these questions earlier,

34:39.720 --> 34:40.980
you seemed to be suggesting

34:40.980 --> 34:44.563
that the increased mixing between al-Nusrah

34:44.629 --> 34:47.212
and the other opposition groups

34:47.350 --> 34:51.517
was an unfortunate side effect of Russia’s stance.

34:51.831 --> 34:54.081
Could it not be their goal?

34:54.783 --> 34:58.533
- Yeah, I mean, that’s one person’s analysis.

34:58.774 --> 35:00.453
I can’t exclude that that’s not--

35:00.453 --> 35:01.599
- [Dave] It's several people's analysis

35:01.599 --> 35:02.960
including several experts, but--

35:02.960 --> 35:06.773
- That’s something you’ll have to ask the Russians.

35:06.773 --> 35:08.250
- Whenever Plan B's mentioned,

35:08.250 --> 35:10.076
you say there’s no good options,

35:10.076 --> 35:13.873
and military options, you don’t see a military solution.

35:13.873 --> 35:17.104
How many sanctions has this Administration

35:17.104 --> 35:20.477
put on Russia as a result of a year of intervention

35:20.477 --> 35:21.832
that has killed, I don’t know--

35:21.832 --> 35:22.665
- Well, you’re right, our sanctions--

35:22.665 --> 35:23.988
- When you say thousands of civilians,

35:23.988 --> 35:27.122
how many sanctions has the US government levied?

35:27.122 --> 35:28.226
- We have sanctions in place,

35:28.226 --> 35:30.331
but regarding their behavior and--

35:30.331 --> 35:31.164
- [Man In Blue Jacket] In Ukraine.

35:31.164 --> 35:31.997
- And their actions in Ukraine.

35:31.997 --> 35:34.830
No, I was just about to say that.

35:38.614 --> 35:40.364
Another valid option,

35:41.928 --> 35:45.011
one among many that we’re looking at,

35:45.449 --> 35:47.265
but I don’t have anything particularly to announce.

35:47.265 --> 35:48.432
- Why in 2012,

35:50.905 --> 35:53.155
maybe even the end of 2011,

35:53.463 --> 35:57.630
the US applied sanctions on various Iranian entities

35:58.528 --> 36:00.278
for supporting Syria.

36:02.525 --> 36:06.692
Given that Russia’s involvement has taken on a level,

36:06.712 --> 36:10.491
at least through air power, that far outstrips Iran,

36:10.491 --> 36:13.824
what made the Iranian support so heinous

36:15.337 --> 36:18.087
in the deaths they caused that it

36:18.666 --> 36:21.166
prompted a sanctions response?

36:21.375 --> 36:24.366
And what makes the Russian one so blase

36:24.366 --> 36:27.324
or not so significant that it doesn’t

36:27.324 --> 36:30.407
get a sanctions response from the US?

36:30.965 --> 36:31.798
- So, um,

36:36.443 --> 36:38.256
with regard to sanctions,

36:38.256 --> 36:41.876
as I said, we do have already pretty severe sanctions,

36:41.876 --> 36:45.543
again, directed at their behavior in Ukraine

36:46.530 --> 36:48.481
in place against Russia.

36:48.481 --> 36:51.642
So, whenever you’re looking at whether to sanction more

36:51.642 --> 36:54.408
or to increase the pressure on the Russian economy,

36:54.408 --> 36:56.908
you weigh a number of options.

36:58.057 --> 36:59.343
Sanctions can be very effective.

36:59.343 --> 37:01.377
We’ve seen it in the case of Iran,

37:01.377 --> 37:04.716
especially with regard to their nuclear program.

37:04.716 --> 37:08.633
But we also want to weigh that with our ability

37:08.803 --> 37:11.217
to work effectively with Russia.

37:11.217 --> 37:12.050
We just haven’t reached

37:12.050 --> 37:13.312
that decision point yet, I guess is my --

37:13.312 --> 37:15.930
- So it was the diplomatic track that remained open

37:15.930 --> 37:18.259
that kept sanctions out of play on Russia

37:18.259 --> 37:21.063
for all this death and destruction

37:21.063 --> 37:23.480
over the last several months?

37:24.420 --> 37:27.420
- That was one element of it, but --

37:27.569 --> 37:29.486
- And then, so if this,

37:31.268 --> 37:33.268
if this engagement ends,

37:34.113 --> 37:36.696
what precludes the US from then

37:36.945 --> 37:40.112
taking a sanctions response to Russia?

37:40.229 --> 37:42.896
- Again, I’m not gonna engage in

37:43.581 --> 37:45.671
hypotheticals about what we may or may not do,

37:45.671 --> 37:48.399
except to say that there’s a number of options out there,

37:48.399 --> 37:51.645
and we’ll continue to look at them all.

37:51.645 --> 37:53.895
They’re all being discussed

37:54.216 --> 37:56.383
and debated and considered

37:56.793 --> 37:58.805
and sanctions are among them.

37:58.805 --> 37:59.638
Please.

37:59.638 --> 38:00.471
- [Lucas] Questions on Iran, Mark.

38:00.471 --> 38:01.375
- Yeah, of course.

38:01.375 --> 38:04.568
- On the subject of the Wall Street Journal story today,

38:04.568 --> 38:06.458
what impact did the analysts here

38:06.458 --> 38:08.188
at the State Department assess

38:08.188 --> 38:10.444
that the delisting of those two banks,

38:10.444 --> 38:11.868
which are so intimately tied

38:11.868 --> 38:14.407
to Iran’s ballistic missile program,

38:14.407 --> 38:18.506
would have on Iran’s development of ballistic missiles?

38:18.506 --> 38:22.006
- So first of all, the story you bring up,

38:29.399 --> 38:33.566
none of the facts of that story were particularly new,

38:36.775 --> 38:40.942
but what I can say is that we did, when we were looking at,

38:41.906 --> 38:44.073
so we had agreed to delist

38:45.835 --> 38:47.849
or remove the designation, rather,

38:47.849 --> 38:49.597
Specially Designated Nationals

38:49.597 --> 38:52.514
and Blocked Persons List, SDN list.

38:52.642 --> 38:54.279
We'd agreed to remove Bank Sepah

38:54.279 --> 38:58.446
from that list on implementation day as part of the JCPOA.

38:59.429 --> 39:00.262
Now,

39:03.278 --> 39:07.445
as part of that process, we looked at all the entities.

39:07.594 --> 39:10.594
We conducted a very thorough review,

39:12.037 --> 39:16.204
in essence updating what we knew about Bank Sepah,

39:18.039 --> 39:20.289
and whether they qualified.

39:20.310 --> 39:23.378
And it was our assessment that they did qualify, so--

39:23.378 --> 39:25.328
- [Lucas] And is that because they were no longer tied

39:25.328 --> 39:28.078
to the ballistic missile program?

39:28.751 --> 39:30.313
- Yeah, that’s exactly right.

39:30.313 --> 39:32.486
That they were no longer carrying out actions

39:32.486 --> 39:34.272
that we believed were linked to

39:34.272 --> 39:38.272
or linked them to the ballistic missile program.

39:48.917 --> 39:50.432
And then, of course, there was

39:50.432 --> 39:53.765
the then subsequent delisting by the UN.

39:54.788 --> 39:55.868
But what’s important also to remember

39:55.868 --> 39:57.858
in any of this, whenever we’re talking

39:57.858 --> 40:00.982
about delisting someone from sanctions,

40:00.982 --> 40:03.899
that we always maintain the ability

40:04.652 --> 40:07.902
to reimpose US sanctions on Bank Sepah,

40:08.812 --> 40:12.062
or any other entity in Iran, if we then

40:13.520 --> 40:15.770
consider their behavior is,

40:17.957 --> 40:18.790
or merits.

40:18.969 --> 40:23.062
- And did Secretary Kerry believe that unshackling the banks

40:23.062 --> 40:25.275
that have financed Iran’s ballistic missile program

40:25.275 --> 40:28.192
will somehow slow down the program?

40:29.092 --> 40:29.925
- That--

40:30.009 --> 40:31.138
- Did Secretary Kerry believe

40:31.138 --> 40:34.778
that removing the sanctions against these banks,

40:34.778 --> 40:36.129
did he believe that would slow down

40:36.129 --> 40:39.513
Iran’s nuclear ballistic missile program?

40:39.513 --> 40:42.457
- Not necessarily, I think this was part of, again,

40:42.457 --> 40:46.124
some of the things we looked at, in terms of

40:46.127 --> 40:49.568
the determinations that we made as part of the JCPOA,

40:49.568 --> 40:52.332
which entities needed to continue to be sanctioned.

40:52.332 --> 40:53.696
That’s something we do all the time,

40:53.696 --> 40:55.779
but it's certainly within the framework

40:55.779 --> 40:58.279
of the JCPOA we looked at, but

40:59.759 --> 41:02.926
we make no excuses for what was a very

41:05.031 --> 41:08.031
considered determination with regard

41:08.089 --> 41:10.617
to Bank Sepah’s role in the ballistic program

41:10.617 --> 41:13.067
but also that we continue to have concerns

41:13.067 --> 41:15.102
about Iran’s ballistic missile program.

41:15.102 --> 41:17.688
- And Chairman Royce and others on Capitol Hill

41:17.688 --> 41:18.894
have complained that the briefings

41:18.894 --> 41:22.012
to congressional staff only occur after decisions

41:22.012 --> 41:24.135
are being made, not beforehand.

41:24.135 --> 41:25.860
Why is the administration only

41:25.860 --> 41:28.693
briefing lawmakers after the fact?

41:28.835 --> 41:31.031
- I don’t have the specific timeline in front of me.

41:31.031 --> 41:33.066
I mean, I know that we made all the materials available

41:33.066 --> 41:35.316
to Congress for their consideration,

41:35.316 --> 41:36.149
so we weren’t trying to --

41:36.149 --> 41:36.982
- [Lucas] After the fact or before?

41:36.982 --> 41:39.172
- I don’t know, to be honest.

41:39.172 --> 41:41.141
I don’t have that in front of me.

41:41.141 --> 41:43.561
But we certainly try to be responsive

41:43.561 --> 41:44.948
and work with Congress and make them aware

41:44.948 --> 41:47.135
of what actions we’re taking,

41:47.135 --> 41:47.968
especially with regard to Iran.

41:47.968 --> 41:49.191
- [Lucas] Are there any other parts of this

41:49.191 --> 41:52.425
nuclear agreement or implementation day

41:52.425 --> 41:54.563
that we just don’t know about?

41:54.563 --> 41:58.325
There’s now three documents that are signed by Mr. McGurk.

41:58.325 --> 41:59.715
Is there a fourth document?

41:59.715 --> 42:01.764
- So, one of the reasons I said

42:01.764 --> 42:04.581
that there’s nothing particularly new in this story

42:04.581 --> 42:07.081
is that this was all came out,

42:07.257 --> 42:10.674
and there’s even several articles written

42:11.140 --> 42:13.557
at the time that it happened.

42:14.163 --> 42:17.163
I think there was so much happening,

42:18.197 --> 42:19.782
we’ve talked about that quite a bit,

42:19.782 --> 42:22.865
in that very congested period of time

42:23.215 --> 42:27.382
around implementation day, that I think elements were lost,

42:27.615 --> 42:30.115
and there wasn’t a recognition

42:30.377 --> 42:32.168
of all the pieces that were in play.

42:32.168 --> 42:33.626
- Was the delisting the two banks,

42:33.626 --> 42:35.478
was that more leverage to use against--

42:35.478 --> 42:36.529
- Not at all, not at all,

42:36.529 --> 42:37.623
it was just a different, again, and we’ve talked

42:37.623 --> 42:41.276
about this a lot, and that’s, what would I say,

42:41.276 --> 42:42.498
that it’s so much, whether it was

42:42.498 --> 42:44.915
the detainees being released,

42:46.142 --> 42:49.028
whether it was the Hague settlement being paid,

42:49.028 --> 42:51.849
whether it was the delisting of this bank,

42:51.849 --> 42:53.909
there was a lot that happened in a very short time span,

42:53.909 --> 42:55.449
but they were not linked.

42:55.449 --> 42:56.282
- Please?

42:56.282 --> 42:57.529
- [Lucas] Was this the sweetener to the deal, like--

42:57.529 --> 42:58.362
- Not at all. No.

42:58.362 --> 43:00.281
- We’re very close to getting the prisoners released and--

43:00.281 --> 43:04.148
- No, again, what it was, and we’ve said as much,

43:04.148 --> 43:08.315
is that we had a window, we had a moment, an opportunity

43:08.673 --> 43:12.343
to seal a number of different deals, if you will,

43:12.343 --> 43:16.426
to close a number of different outstanding issues

43:17.208 --> 43:20.006
with Iran, and we sought to do so.

43:20.006 --> 43:20.839
- [Lucas] And final question.

43:20.839 --> 43:21.672
- Please, go ahead.

43:21.672 --> 43:22.505
- Just to go back to that first one,

43:22.505 --> 43:24.527
was there any kind of internal assessment done

43:24.527 --> 43:28.444
that told the Secretary and other top officials

43:28.459 --> 43:30.308
what delisting these banks would have

43:30.308 --> 43:33.308
on Iran’s ballistic missile program?

43:35.201 --> 43:36.359
- What, and I’m sorry, I just want

43:36.359 --> 43:37.478
to make sure I understand that.

43:37.478 --> 43:39.577
- Did analysts here at the State Department

43:39.577 --> 43:43.744
study what would happen after this delisting occurred?

43:44.755 --> 43:47.401
Was there any kind of analytics done

43:47.401 --> 43:49.598
to say what impact delisting these banks

43:49.598 --> 43:51.497
would have on Iran’s ballistic missile program?

43:51.497 --> 43:52.593
- Yes. It was made.

43:52.593 --> 43:54.743
The determination was made after a careful review

43:54.743 --> 43:57.675
of the activity of all the individuals and entities,

43:57.675 --> 43:59.425
including Bank Sepah,

44:00.490 --> 44:03.573
that would be removed from this list,

44:03.901 --> 44:05.125
SDN list that I talked about,

44:05.125 --> 44:07.908
Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List,

44:07.908 --> 44:09.274
on implementation day.

44:09.274 --> 44:12.502
So, this was not done in any way, shape,

44:12.502 --> 44:15.335
or form haphazardly or by impulse.

44:16.039 --> 44:19.622
This was a part of a very thorough review.

44:21.438 --> 44:22.771
Yup, please sir.

44:22.946 --> 44:24.749
- [Blonde Man] Yeah, so the Philippines.

44:24.749 --> 44:25.582
- Yes.

44:25.643 --> 44:29.227
- Recently, Duterte likened himself to Hitler

44:29.227 --> 44:32.034
and said that he’d be happy to slaughter

44:32.034 --> 44:35.617
the drug users and peddlers in his country.

44:35.830 --> 44:37.274
Has anyone from the State Department

44:37.274 --> 44:38.854
been in contact with the Philippines

44:38.854 --> 44:41.271
in regards to these comments?

44:43.134 --> 44:43.967
- I’m not aware.

44:43.967 --> 44:45.204
I don’t know what our bilateral mission,

44:45.204 --> 44:48.571
if they’ve been in contact with the Philippine Government.

44:48.571 --> 44:51.678
You’ve seen a number of, not the US Government,

44:51.678 --> 44:54.178
but a number of voices comment

44:54.295 --> 44:58.462
on (chuckles) President Duterte’s remarks.

44:58.886 --> 45:01.386
Look, what I would say to that

45:01.786 --> 45:05.184
is that America’s relationship, or partnership,

45:05.184 --> 45:07.601
with the Philippines is long,

45:08.542 --> 45:10.375
and it’s been based on

45:11.503 --> 45:14.503
a mutual foundation of shared values

45:16.473 --> 45:19.062
and that includes our shared belief in

45:19.062 --> 45:21.979
human rights and human dignity, and

45:24.049 --> 45:28.132
within that context, President Duterte’s comments

45:28.716 --> 45:30.966
are a significant departure

45:32.817 --> 45:34.484
from that tradition,

45:35.394 --> 45:37.644
and we find them troubling.

45:39.055 --> 45:42.205
- So obviously, he’s had some couple other spats,

45:42.205 --> 45:44.657
especially with Obama and such.

45:44.657 --> 45:46.486
How much longer is the State Department

45:46.486 --> 45:50.653
going to let him go on these kind of off-the-wall comments?

45:55.749 --> 45:57.666
- As I said previously,

45:57.902 --> 46:02.069
words matter, especially when they’re from leaders of

46:03.747 --> 46:05.972
sovereign nations, and especially sovereign nations

46:05.972 --> 46:08.297
with whom we have a long and,

46:08.297 --> 46:11.047
as I said, valued relations with.

46:12.628 --> 46:15.795
But what I’ve also been clear about is

46:16.572 --> 46:17.721
from a government-to-government level,

46:17.721 --> 46:18.856
or at a government-to-government level,

46:18.856 --> 46:22.523
we continue to productively, constructively,

46:23.028 --> 46:26.195
closely cooperate with the Philippines

46:26.412 --> 46:27.985
on a number of issues.

46:27.985 --> 46:29.953
And our people-to-people ties remain strong.

46:29.953 --> 46:33.703
Our security and military ties remain strong.

46:33.793 --> 46:37.126
Our economic ties remain strong, and so,

46:37.898 --> 46:39.565
while there is this,

46:40.209 --> 46:42.631
you know, there's these remarks

46:42.631 --> 46:44.631
occasionally being made,

46:44.633 --> 46:47.897
at the working level our relationship remains

46:47.897 --> 46:49.218
very strong and very vital.

46:49.218 --> 46:51.687
- [Blonde Man] So you see no hindrance about these.

46:51.687 --> 46:53.596
There’s no hindrance with the relationship

46:53.596 --> 46:54.429
after these comments?

46:54.429 --> 46:55.262
- Not that we’ve seen, no.

46:55.262 --> 46:56.095
- [Blonde Man] Okay. Thank you.

46:56.095 --> 46:57.095
- Yeah. Dan.

46:57.527 --> 46:58.469
- [Dan] Philippines security forces

46:58.469 --> 47:00.575
are acting on this kind of rhetoric.

47:00.575 --> 47:02.483
There have been reports of killings.

47:02.483 --> 47:03.902
Is there a point where you can’t work

47:03.902 --> 47:05.418
with the Philippines security forces?

47:05.418 --> 47:06.251
- No, I understand that.

47:06.251 --> 47:07.967
And where we have been deeply concerned

47:07.967 --> 47:11.217
about reports of extrajudicial killings

47:12.352 --> 47:14.690
by or at the behest of the government authorities

47:14.690 --> 47:17.141
in the Philippines, and have called on

47:17.141 --> 47:19.974
and repeat our calls for thorough,

47:20.471 --> 47:22.458
transparent investigations into any credible

47:22.458 --> 47:24.525
report of extrajudicial killings.

47:24.525 --> 47:26.401
- [Man In Blue Jacket] Mark, I just, quickly on that,

47:26.401 --> 47:28.932
he’s basically calling for the death

47:28.932 --> 47:30.932
of three million people.

47:31.650 --> 47:32.733
Your response

47:34.163 --> 47:36.805
doesn’t really, I mean, you find it troubling.

47:36.805 --> 47:39.222
It seems more than troubling.

47:40.706 --> 47:42.206
- Again, you know,

47:46.262 --> 47:47.762
I think that it’s,

47:49.166 --> 47:51.999
again, what I said before was that

47:52.359 --> 47:56.359
when we listen to these kinds of comments, it is

47:59.782 --> 48:03.949
concerning, especially from the leader of a nation

48:06.530 --> 48:08.947
with whom we have such a long

48:09.749 --> 48:12.166
and valued relationship with,

48:12.253 --> 48:14.253
and one that is based on

48:15.181 --> 48:18.206
concern about human rights, democracy,

48:18.206 --> 48:20.956
all the values that we hold dear.

48:21.666 --> 48:23.666
And I’ll leave it there.

48:24.086 --> 48:25.166
- Is there any concern

48:25.166 --> 48:27.685
that if you criticize him too strongly,

48:27.685 --> 48:30.039
despite these outrageous actions and comments,

48:30.039 --> 48:32.399
that you’d be driving him towards

48:32.399 --> 48:34.005
strong relations with China and Russia,

48:34.005 --> 48:35.729
which he has expressed interest in?

48:35.729 --> 48:36.855
- And I’m aware of those remarks,

48:36.855 --> 48:38.201
and we’ve been very clear,

48:38.201 --> 48:39.657
Secretary Kerry’s been very clear

48:39.657 --> 48:42.574
when he met with President Duterte,

48:43.089 --> 48:45.897
this is not a zero-sum game for us.

48:45.897 --> 48:48.147
We’re not trying to dictate

48:48.178 --> 48:51.261
with whom the Philippines should have

48:51.567 --> 48:53.325
stronger relations with.

48:53.325 --> 48:54.662
Our only concern is that we want

48:54.662 --> 48:58.280
to maintain our strong relationship with the Philippines.

48:58.280 --> 49:00.755
But again, I’ll stress that it has

49:00.755 --> 49:03.229
to be one that’s based on shared values,

49:03.229 --> 49:07.229
democratic values, respect for human rights, and

49:09.573 --> 49:10.445
words matter.

49:10.445 --> 49:11.520
I’ll say it again.

49:11.520 --> 49:12.451
- So you don’t think that you’re pulling

49:12.451 --> 49:15.446
any punches in his, in criticizing him?

49:15.446 --> 49:17.977
- I’ll leave it where I left it.

49:17.977 --> 49:18.810
- Oh, sure.

49:18.810 --> 49:20.768
I’m sorry, and then you in the back.

49:20.768 --> 49:22.058
- [Man In Purple Shirt] India-Pakistan.

49:22.058 --> 49:25.358
- But I looked at her and then I promise I’ll get to you.

49:25.358 --> 49:26.191
Yes.

49:26.191 --> 49:29.197
- Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump,

49:29.197 --> 49:32.223
suggested that former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton,

49:32.223 --> 49:34.806
fast-tracked the citizenship of

49:34.835 --> 49:37.349
former Miss Universe Alicia Machado.

49:37.349 --> 49:40.159
Is that something that you think would be possible

49:40.159 --> 49:42.814
for her to have done, either in her capacity

49:42.814 --> 49:46.981
as Secretary of State, or after as a former Secretary?

49:47.859 --> 49:50.526
- So the naturalization process,

49:50.717 --> 49:53.634
as you probably know, is handled by

49:54.776 --> 49:58.443
the US Citizenship and Immigration Services.

49:58.886 --> 50:01.890
So for any questions about any individual case like that,

50:01.890 --> 50:03.534
I’d have to refer you to them.

50:03.534 --> 50:05.881
Please, oh, you, oh, I’m so sorry.

50:05.881 --> 50:06.967
- [Man In Purple Shirt] Oh, sorry, okay.

50:06.967 --> 50:08.253
- No, I apologize. I’m --

50:08.253 --> 50:11.753
- So, you refer the questions to them, but

50:12.155 --> 50:16.322
do you reject the statement that the Secretary of State

50:16.692 --> 50:20.356
interfered with the immigration process in this case?

50:20.356 --> 50:22.324
Or are you just saying you have no comment on that?

50:22.324 --> 50:25.241
- I have no comment other than that

50:25.335 --> 50:27.668
we have no reason to believe

50:27.695 --> 50:29.866
in the veracity of that statement.

50:29.866 --> 50:30.699
- [Man In Blue Jacket] Thank you.

50:30.699 --> 50:31.532
- Please.

50:31.532 --> 50:32.490
- [Man In Purple Shirt] Have you got any assurance

50:32.490 --> 50:35.565
from either India or Pakistan regarding the situation

50:35.565 --> 50:38.157
on the Line of Control about what future course

50:38.157 --> 50:40.956
of action each of them might take?

50:40.956 --> 50:44.511
- Do we have any, I apologize, any clarity, you said?

50:44.511 --> 50:47.259
- Any assurance from either India or Pakistan

50:47.259 --> 50:51.342
on what future action they might plan on the LOC.

50:52.343 --> 50:56.510
- Well, I think John Kirby spoke a little bit about this.

50:57.742 --> 50:59.321
We’re continuing to follow the situation

50:59.321 --> 51:01.571
on the ground very closely.

51:02.088 --> 51:02.921
From our perspective,

51:02.921 --> 51:06.338
we urge calm and restraint by both sides.

51:06.384 --> 51:08.215
We understand that the Pakistani

51:08.215 --> 51:12.064
and Indian militaries have been in communication,

51:12.064 --> 51:15.022
and we believe that continued communication

51:15.022 --> 51:18.684
between them is important to reduce tensions.

51:18.684 --> 51:20.120
I think we certainly don’t want to see

51:20.120 --> 51:23.120
any kind of escalation and certainly

51:23.242 --> 51:25.864
any kind of break in that communication.

51:25.864 --> 51:28.781
We have repeatedly and consistently

51:29.990 --> 51:32.596
expressed our concerns regarding the danger

51:32.596 --> 51:36.139
that cross-border terrorism poses for the region,

51:36.139 --> 51:37.601
and that certainly includes

51:37.601 --> 51:40.601
the recent terrorist attacks in Uri.

51:42.648 --> 51:45.229
And we continue to urge actions

51:45.229 --> 51:48.295
to combat and de-escalate and delegitimize, rather,

51:48.295 --> 51:51.545
terrorist groups like Lashkar-e Talaba,

51:52.292 --> 51:54.644
Tayyiba, rather, Haqqani Network,

51:54.644 --> 51:56.977
as well as Jaish-e-Mohammad.

51:58.078 --> 51:58.911
Yes, sir.

51:58.911 --> 52:00.015
- [Bald Man] Yeah, it’s from the same.

52:00.015 --> 52:02.756
I just have some few clarifications.

52:02.756 --> 52:06.339
Did you have any pre-knowledge of this so-called

52:06.339 --> 52:09.724
Indian surgical strike on Pakistani soil?

52:09.724 --> 52:12.211
- No, I don’t have anything for you on that, sorry.

52:12.211 --> 52:13.044
- And, um,

52:14.014 --> 52:17.097
it’s all based on an Indian statement

52:17.116 --> 52:19.107
that this happened, and the Pakistan say

52:19.107 --> 52:21.620
that it didn’t happen, and then it says two killed

52:21.620 --> 52:23.787
and they have arrested, so

52:25.829 --> 52:28.412
on what basis are you reacting?

52:29.547 --> 52:31.602
On the basis of the statement from India,

52:31.602 --> 52:33.903
on the basis of, do you have,

52:33.903 --> 52:35.944
I know you don’t talk about the intelligence matters.

52:35.944 --> 52:38.267
- We have high-level engagement, as you can imagine,

52:38.267 --> 52:42.174
with both governments, and our assessment is based on that.

52:42.174 --> 52:45.129
- [Bald Man] So, you confirm it happened?

52:45.129 --> 52:46.832
- It’s not for me to confirm it happened.

52:46.832 --> 52:48.325
It’s for the governments themselves

52:48.325 --> 52:50.325
to speak to their roles.

52:50.733 --> 52:52.900
- Okay, and then there was

52:54.033 --> 52:56.450
calls between Secretary Kerry

52:56.616 --> 53:00.783
and Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj.

53:01.203 --> 53:04.120
- [Mark] There was, a few days ago.

53:04.261 --> 53:05.511
Yeah, was there

53:06.877 --> 53:10.710
a suggestion from Secretary to Indian minister

53:11.596 --> 53:15.763
to cool down the whatever was going on at the UNGA

53:16.680 --> 53:19.847
and take it easy before this happened?

53:22.466 --> 53:24.865
- I’ll have to see if I can get you

53:24.865 --> 53:26.782
a readout of that call,

53:27.741 --> 53:29.532
but again, it's part of our,

53:29.532 --> 53:30.790
we’re very concerned about the situation there.

53:30.790 --> 53:33.319
We don’t want to see it escalate any further.

53:33.319 --> 53:35.652
And as part of that concern,

53:36.840 --> 53:40.923
the Secretary is certainly engaged and talking to

53:41.026 --> 53:43.712
Indian leadership, senior Indian leadership.

53:43.712 --> 53:45.378
- Just the last one.

53:45.378 --> 53:46.878
Just the last one.

53:48.921 --> 53:51.225
Pakistan has reacted, saying that

53:51.225 --> 53:54.558
if India does it again, they will react.

53:54.773 --> 53:57.994
And then they also talked about using nukes.

53:57.994 --> 54:00.969
Like, they don’t have a no-first-use policy,

54:00.969 --> 54:03.444
like India has declared a no-first-use.

54:03.444 --> 54:05.279
So do you, according to,

54:05.279 --> 54:08.446
as you have the high-level connections

54:09.015 --> 54:11.239
and the intelligence reports,

54:11.239 --> 54:13.992
which you do not talk from the podium,

54:13.992 --> 54:16.492
do you expect further trouble?

54:18.608 --> 54:19.525
- So just to answer your question

54:19.525 --> 54:22.543
about some of the rhetoric from the Pakistani Government

54:22.543 --> 54:26.710
and the possibility of using nukes or nuclear weapons,

54:28.473 --> 54:31.621
I would just say nuclear-capable states have a

54:31.621 --> 54:35.362
very clear responsibility to exercise restraint

54:35.362 --> 54:39.000
regarding nuclear weapons and missile capabilities.

54:39.000 --> 54:41.500
And that’s my message publicly

54:41.814 --> 54:43.412
and that’s certainly our message directly

54:43.412 --> 54:45.490
to the Pakistani authorities.

54:45.490 --> 54:46.698
- [Man In Purple Shirt] So after your call

54:46.698 --> 54:48.723
for restrain and calm, the signals that you get

54:48.723 --> 54:52.890
from India and Pakistan, are they reassuring for you?

54:53.007 --> 54:54.511
- I don’t have a real readout.

54:54.511 --> 54:56.657
I think we’re just still following the situation

54:56.657 --> 54:57.803
on the ground very closely.

54:57.803 --> 54:58.636
Please.

54:58.636 --> 55:01.477
- Yeah, today New York Times published an article based

55:01.477 --> 55:05.215
on leaked audio of Secretary Clinton’s fundraiser

55:05.215 --> 55:07.882
in which she is heard as saying,

55:08.403 --> 55:10.177
expressing concerns about the security

55:10.177 --> 55:12.211
of Pakistani nuclear weapons,

55:12.211 --> 55:14.560
and she also talks about a nuclear

55:14.560 --> 55:16.690
suicide bomber kind of thing.

55:16.690 --> 55:18.474
Do you agree with her assessment?

55:18.474 --> 55:21.787
Do you have concerns about Pakistan’s nuclear security?

55:21.787 --> 55:24.381
- Well, I think I just attempted to speak

55:24.381 --> 55:26.131
to that concern about

55:28.861 --> 55:29.872
some of the rhetoric, as I said,

55:29.872 --> 55:31.326
we’ve seen coming out of Pakistan,

55:31.326 --> 55:34.076
regarding its nuclear weapons or,

55:36.726 --> 55:39.719
with regard to, I haven’t seen her remarks, honestly.

55:39.719 --> 55:41.582
I just haven’t seen them, so I can’t speak to them.

55:41.582 --> 55:42.415
Sorry.

55:42.415 --> 55:43.999
- The rhetoric or the statement has come

55:43.999 --> 55:47.930
from none other than the defense minister himself.

55:47.930 --> 55:50.104
And in this month twice in interviews,

55:50.104 --> 55:51.521
he has said use--

55:52.515 --> 55:53.348
- Sorry, I don’t mean to talk over you,

55:53.348 --> 55:55.302
but I just said, obviously,

55:55.302 --> 55:59.469
we believe that nuclear-capable states have a very

56:03.092 --> 56:06.675
clear responsibility to use nuclear weapons

56:08.785 --> 56:09.785
responsibly.

56:09.823 --> 56:11.141
- [Man In Blue Jacket] To not use them.

56:11.141 --> 56:13.752
- Well, to not use them, exactly.

56:13.752 --> 56:16.270
But also to refrain from rhetoric.

56:16.270 --> 56:17.277
Did I just say use?

56:17.277 --> 56:18.521
- [Man In Blue Jacket] Use them responsibly.

56:18.521 --> 56:19.354
(reporters laugh)

56:19.354 --> 56:20.187
- Well, this is what happens

56:20.187 --> 56:23.434
when you keep me up here for 90-plus minutes.

56:23.434 --> 56:26.184
Yeah, to not use nuclear weapons,

56:26.615 --> 56:29.208
and with that, I’m going to cut you all off.

56:29.208 --> 56:30.041
I want to go to--

56:30.041 --> 56:31.440
- I have one more.

56:31.440 --> 56:33.273
Bahrain, Nabeel Rajab,

56:34.166 --> 56:37.333
I think he has a court date next week.

56:38.158 --> 56:39.446
What does the US expect,

56:39.446 --> 56:43.029
and will any American officials be present?

56:45.723 --> 56:46.556
Bahrain, sorry.

56:46.556 --> 56:48.259
- Yeah, Bahrain, sorry, of course.

56:48.259 --> 56:49.496
Well, you know our concerns.

56:49.496 --> 56:53.501
We’ve been quite vocal about this individual and his case.

56:53.501 --> 56:57.098
I can’t say whether we’ll be actually in attendance,

56:57.098 --> 56:58.665
but I can imagine we will.

56:58.665 --> 57:00.639
Certainly, we’re following the trial closely.

57:00.639 --> 57:02.140
What was the other part of the question?

57:02.140 --> 57:05.065
- [Man In Blue Jacket] What you expect in this hearing,

57:05.065 --> 57:07.805
do you expect due process to be with--

57:07.805 --> 57:08.858
- Yeah, of course, we want to see--

57:08.858 --> 57:09.691
- [Man In Blue Jacket] Do you expect him

57:09.691 --> 57:11.808
to be released given that you don’t think the charges--

57:11.808 --> 57:14.843
- Precisely, and that we’ve said that before.

57:14.843 --> 57:16.606
But we certainly at the very least

57:16.606 --> 57:18.951
want to see a transparent trial for him.

57:18.951 --> 57:20.692
- Similar case, different side of the Gulf.

57:20.692 --> 57:24.859
Narges Mohammadi, the Iranian women’s rights activist,

57:25.625 --> 57:29.125
appeal court confirmed a 16-year sentence.

57:29.632 --> 57:30.465
Your views?

57:30.465 --> 57:31.298
- Yes,

57:36.424 --> 57:38.424
I'll share them shortly.

57:53.978 --> 57:56.948
I know that my views are in here somewhere.

57:56.948 --> 57:58.303
(reporter mumbles)

57:58.303 --> 57:59.386
(Mark laughs)

57:59.386 --> 58:02.469
I know, but I really want to get the,

58:03.749 --> 58:05.285
the flavor of it for you.

58:05.285 --> 58:08.035
No, just one second, I apologize.

58:08.635 --> 58:09.468
Ah!

58:11.962 --> 58:13.741
We’re deeply troubled by reports

58:13.741 --> 58:15.578
that Iranian courts have upheld

58:15.578 --> 58:17.816
the 16-year prison sentence of Iranian journalist

58:17.816 --> 58:21.483
and human rights defender, Narges Mohammadi.

58:21.651 --> 58:25.003
No one should be jailed for peaceful civic activism.

58:25.003 --> 58:27.149
We are further concerned about reports

58:27.149 --> 58:30.147
that Mohammadi’s health is rapidly deteriorating

58:30.147 --> 58:32.117
while in prison, and that she’s been cut off

58:32.117 --> 58:34.619
from communicating with her two young children.

58:34.619 --> 58:36.307
Given these circumstances,

58:36.307 --> 58:38.882
the imposition of this prison sentence

58:38.882 --> 58:41.952
is particularly harsh and unjustified,

58:41.952 --> 58:44.434
and we call on the government of Iran

58:44.434 --> 58:47.824
to provide Mohammadi with adequate medical care

58:47.824 --> 58:50.932
and to release her on humanitarian grounds.

58:50.932 --> 58:52.070
- [Man In Blue Jacket] And just one more on Iran,

58:52.070 --> 58:54.589
is there anything more that needs to come out

58:54.589 --> 58:56.060
about implementation day?

58:56.060 --> 58:57.680
Are there any other documents or new--

58:57.680 --> 58:58.694
- I just thought I answered this.

58:58.694 --> 59:00.111
No, I mean, look,

59:01.359 --> 59:02.772
again, we understand that a lot happened

59:02.772 --> 59:05.439
in a very condensed time period.

59:06.388 --> 59:08.030
We tried to be as forthcoming during

59:08.030 --> 59:10.243
that time period about all the different elements

59:10.243 --> 59:11.826
that came together,

59:12.694 --> 59:13.990
understand the level of interest

59:13.990 --> 59:16.573
in this historic agreement, but

59:17.771 --> 59:20.294
I can’t say that there's anything new

59:20.294 --> 59:22.527
or more to come out on what we agreed on.

59:22.527 --> 59:23.485
- [Man In Blue Jacket] And finally,

59:23.485 --> 59:25.340
are Aleppo’s days numbered?

59:25.340 --> 59:27.989
- Again, I think that I spoke about this before.

59:27.989 --> 59:30.067
I’m not a military tactician.

59:30.067 --> 59:34.150
I think that Aleppo is under tremendous pressure.

59:34.342 --> 59:36.313
We’re watching it closely.

59:36.313 --> 59:40.480
What we really want to see there is an end to this

59:40.635 --> 59:43.101
inhumane besiegement of the city.

59:43.101 --> 59:43.934
Please.

59:43.957 --> 59:45.541
- Do you have anything on the,

59:45.541 --> 59:47.752
any update on the US citizens who were,

59:47.752 --> 59:50.682
who reportedly died in the Seychelles?

59:50.682 --> 59:51.515
- Yes,

59:52.834 --> 59:53.667
hold on.

59:54.159 --> 59:56.992
I’m not sure I have much to offer,

59:58.111 --> 59:59.694
but I know this is,

01:00:02.981 --> 01:00:04.831
I apologize, one second.

01:00:04.831 --> 01:00:07.834
So as you note, there were the deaths

01:00:07.834 --> 01:00:11.730
of two US citizens in the Seychelles last week.

01:00:11.730 --> 01:00:12.809
It goes without saying that we extend

01:00:12.809 --> 01:00:14.652
our deepest condolences to the family and friends

01:00:14.652 --> 01:00:17.819
of these individuals and are certainly

01:00:17.853 --> 01:00:19.056
in the course or in the process

01:00:19.056 --> 01:00:22.496
of providing all appropriate consular assistance.

01:00:22.496 --> 01:00:25.274
For questions about, which is I think where

01:00:25.274 --> 01:00:27.764
you’re going with this, about the circumstances

01:00:27.764 --> 01:00:31.465
of their death and the investigation into their deaths,

01:00:31.465 --> 01:00:33.848
I’d have to refer you to local authorities.

01:00:33.848 --> 01:00:37.181
And out of respect for the family during

01:00:37.814 --> 01:00:40.380
what is clearly a difficult time,

01:00:40.380 --> 01:00:42.579
I don’t have anything else to add.

01:00:42.579 --> 01:00:43.412
- [Man In Blue Jacket] Thank you.

01:00:43.412 --> 01:00:45.079
- Yep. Thanks, guys.

